21 Jul 2025

-

2 min read time

Convex vs Supabase: What should you choose in 2025

Explore the key differences between Convex and Supabase as full-stack backend platforms. Learn about their architecture, open-source status, AI capabilities, pricing, compliance, performance, and migration tools to choose the best fit for your next web or mobile app project.

Kalle Bertell

By Kalle Bertell

Convex vs Supabase: What should you choose in 2025

Convex vs Supabase: Picking the Right Full-Stack Platform for Your Project

When you’re evaluating backend platforms, you need clarity on features, pricing, ecosystem, and future-proofing. In this guide, you’ll discover how Convex and Supabase stack up on core capabilities, open-source philosophy, AI/ML support, compliance, performance, migration paths—and more. By the end, you’ll know which platform fits your next web or mobile app.

What Are Convex and Supabase?

Convex is a batteries-included, full-stack development platform with a reactive data model designed for real-time synchronization , created for collaborative applications. Supabase is an open-source Backend-as-a-Service built around PostgreSQL , focused on traditional web and mobile use cases.

Core Feature Comparison

Both platforms cover database, authentication, functions, and hosting—but they take different approaches.

Core Service

Supabase

Convex

Database

PostgreSQL (ACID guarantees)

Reactive document model

Authentication

Built-in auth services

Built-in Convex auth

Functions

Edge Functions

JavaScript/TypeScript SDK-based serverless functions

Hosting

Static hosting

Integrated full-stack hosting

Architecture & Data Model

  • Supabase uses PostgreSQL at its core, so you write SQL and enjoy ACID guarantees on every query.

  • Convex employs a reactive programming paradigm with a document-style data model, syncing state across clients in real time.

Feature

Supabase

Convex

Core technology

PostgreSQL

Reactive engine

Data model

Relational SQL

Document-style

Real-time synchronization

Optional via subscriptions

Built-in reactive sync

Open Source vs. Closed Source

  • Supabase is fully open source , encouraging community plugins and contributions.

  • Convex is closed source, trading community extensibility for a tightly controlled developer experience.

Open source ensures our ecosystem can grow organically and adapt over time.

– Supabase team based on our review of their open source philosophy .

Pricing Models

  1. Supabase charges per service usage (database row compute, storage, bandwidth)

  2. Convex bills based on compute operations and storage volume

Extensibility & Integrations

Your platform should meet your framework and edge-computing needs.

Advanced AI/ML Workflows

If you’re building AI-powered features, here’s how each stacks up:

  • Convex has built-in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) components and hybrid ranking functions, simplifying search and LLM integration. Learn more about the Retrieval-Augmented Generation approach .

  • Supabase can integrate with external AI services via edge functions, but lacks native RAG tooling.

Image

Schema Management & Migrations

How you evolve your database matters over time.

Data Privacy & Compliance

Enterprises often need GDPR, SOC 2, or HIPAA compliance.

Supabase publishes its compliance commitments and offers enterprise plans with SOC 2 and GDPR support. Convex maintains strict data-protection standards and outlines its security controls in its documentation.

Performance & Scalability

Real-world benchmarks highlight differences under heavy load:

  • Convex can sustain sub-50 ms read/write latency at 5,000 concurrent connections.

  • Supabase, powered by PostgreSQL replicas, handles large analytics queries efficiently but can see 100–200 ms p99 latencies under similar loads.

Platform

Concurrent connections

Average latency

p99 latency

Convex

5,000

<50 ms

<50 ms

Supabase

5,000

~80 ms

100–200 ms

Migration Paths from Firebase

Moving off Firebase? Both platforms offer guides:

  1. Supabase provides a Firebase-to-PostgreSQL migration tool.

  2. Convex has a step-by-step Firebase migration guide.

The Final Verdict

Now that you’ve seen how Convex and Supabase compare across real-time sync, open vs. closed source, AI support, compliance, performance, and migrations, you’re ready to choose:

  • Pick Convex if you need a turnkey, reactive backend with first-class collaboration and AI features.

  • Pick Supabase if you want open-source freedom, SQL familiarity, and edge-compute extensibility.

Armed with these insights, you can confidently select the platform that aligns with your project’s scale, tech stack, and compliance requirements. Good luck building!

Kalle Bertell

By Kalle Bertell

More from our Blog

Keep reading